Why “The Difficult Patient People” deserve an unmissable digital home — most agencies answer a brief like yours with a number; we answered it with attention.
Before we considered a single page of the new site, we set out to understand the company it has to carry. From a two-person start in London in 2010, JWW has become a distributed team across nine countries — with fieldwork reaching seventy, and a rare-disease track record most competitors simply cannot match.
A business that has quietly outgrown its own shop window.
We went through the site page by page — home, Knowledge, Experience, Partnership, case studies, team and articles. The substance is all there — but the site describes what JWW is when it should be selling what JWW does. Your reputation travels by word of mouth, and your website stays out of the conversation.
Your site has become your best-kept secret — and a secret is the one thing a website must never be.
A client gives you a project; a patient gives you trust — and the same page can’t ask for both. Your two audiences arrive with different knowledge, different emotional states and different jobs to be done. Architecture, language, imagery and calls to action must diverge; the feeling of one trustworthy company must not.
Every visitor is routed to their journey within one click of landing.
Within seconds: what you do, where you do it, and why it matters to them.
Proof, credentials, privacy and accessibility treated as trust features.
A feasibility check for clients; a consented register for patients.
One voice, two volumes. The patient section must work as hard operationally as the client section does commercially.
The brand evolution and the website inform each other — done together, each makes the other better and cheaper. Done apart, the second one means rework.
Sixteen years of proof shouldn’t be dressed like year one. Keep the equity; mature the mark, sharpen the palette, put “The Difficult Patient People” at the centre, and define a patient-facing register.
CMS-driven and built for your team to manage — with client and patient journeys, multilingual foundations, and the recruitment database woven in.
These six can each be simple or substantial, depending on decisions no one has made yet. This is why we won’t quote blind — a wide range is just a guess with a signature on it. Here’s exactly what decides each number, so we can decide them together.
Simple: link out to the platform you already operate. Substantial: on-site register, consent and screening flowing into your systems by country and audience.
Simple: a translated core with you supplying translations. Substantial: every page in every language, locally editable, per-market approvals, multilingual SEO.
Simple: email capture to a list, consent recorded. Substantial: segmentation, CRM integration, nurture automation, attribution across markets.
Simple: draft → senior sign-off → publish, one team, one language. Substantial: roles across markets and languages, audit trails, approval per translation.
Simple: site-wide keyword search. Substantial: faceted search across studies, conditions, markets and team — correct in all seven languages.
Simple: your team writes and loads; we structure, edit and train. Substantial: we research, write and migrate the full estate, including the patient register in plain language.
None of the “substantial” options are wrong — but each is a decision, and decisions made early are the cheap kind.
Stakeholder sessions with your team and Sarah, audience definition, and a technical audit of the current estate — the site, the recruitment database, the Japan precedent, analytics access. Short, structured, decisive.
Positioning and messaging architecture, the brand-evolution decision, information architecture for both audiences, the content plan and the governance model — every later decision grounded here.
The visual system in two registers — client and patient — designed mobile-first and accessibility-first, prototyped and tested with real content before a line of build.
CMS, templates, search, integrations and lead capture — English core first, languages phased per market so cost follows value. The recruitment database link built to the depth you chose in Define.
Content load, SEO foundations, analytics, QA across devices and languages, training for your marketing team, and approval workflows live — a controlled, low-drama go-live.
Launch is a beginning, not an exit. Bug fixes, security patches, software updates and ongoing training — a support arrangement sized to how much your team wants to own in-house.
The quality of a proposal is fixed before a word of it is written — by the quality of the questions asked first. Here are ours. Answer whatever is easy in writing, and we’ll walk through the rest on a call; Sarah’s perspective would be especially valuable.
No question here is a test — they’re the twelve decisions that separate an accurate proposal from an optimistic one.
Recommended next step: a 45-minute call with you and Sarah to walk through the questions — especially the recruitment database and the patient-facing journey.